KINNEAR-WEED CORP.

v.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Kolene Corp. v. Motor City Metal Treating, Inc., 440 F.2d 77 (6th Cir. 1971)
  …ical Mfg. Co. v. Altorfer Bros. Co., 238 F. 2d 867 (7th Cir.); Sperry Products Inc. v. Aluminum Co. of America, 171 F.Supp. 901 (N.D.Ohio), rev’d in part on other grounds, 285 F. 2d 911 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, Firestone v. Aluminum Co. of America, 368 U.S. 890, 82 S.Ct. 139, 7 L.Ed.2d 87. An antitrust offense does not necessarily amount to misuse merely because it involves patented products or products which are the subject of a patented process. Hazeltime Research, Inc. v. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., 77 F.…
• Preformed Line Prods. Co. v. The Fanner Mfg. Co., 328 F.2d 265 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …ffice. France Mfg. Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co., 106 F. 2d 605, 608, C.A. 6, cert. den., 309 U.S. 657, 60 S.Ct. 471, 84 L.Ed. 1006; Aluminum Co. of America v. Sperry Products, Inc., 285 F. 2d 911, 916, C.A. 6, cert. den., Firestone v. Aluminum Co., 368 U.S. 890, 82 S.Ct. 139, 142, 7 L.Ed. 2d 87; Holstensson v. V-M Corp., 325 F. 2d 109, 121-122, C.A. 6; Harvey v. Levine, 322 F. 2d 481, 484, C.A. 6. This is not to say that the presumption is automatically overthrown. Defendant must do more to invalidate the…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• FMC Corp. v. The F. E. Myers & BRO. Co., 384 F.2d 4 (6th Cir. 1967)
  …clear, as was recognized in the above cases, that the doctrine of equivalents applies to combination patents just as to any other type of invention. Aluminum Co. of America v. Sperry Products, Inc., 285 F. 2d 911, 923 (6th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 890, 82 S.Ct. 142, 7 L.Ed.2d 87 (1961); 3 Walker, Patents § 625 (Deller ed.) cited in United States Rubber Co. v. General Tire & Rubber Co., supra, 128 F. 2d at 109. [*11] In the instant case the District Court found as facts that the confining surface…