VAN ALLEN

v.

UNITED STATES; RELIANCE PICTURE FRAME CO. V. COVENTRY WARE, INC.; CEPERO V. RINCON DE GAUTIER, CITY MANAGER, SAN JUAN; CEPERO V. PUERTO RICO ET AL.; MOORE V. TAYLOR, WARDEN; RICH V. MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR; ROBINSON V. UNITED STATES; CEPERO V. PUERTO RICO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Lynumn v. Illinois, 372 U.S. 528 (U.S. 1963)
  …ty to secure a certificate from the Supreme Court of Illinois as to whether the judgment herein was intended to rest on an adequate and independent state ground, or whether decision of the federal claim . . . was necessary to the judgment rendered.” 368 U. S. 908. The answer of the Supreme Court of Illinois was unambiguous. On June 8, 1962, that court issued the following “Response to Request for Certificate”: “In response to a request by counsel for the plaintiff in error we hereby certify that decision of…
• United States v. Lester, 328 F.2d 971 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …the right by failure to request that the case be brought to trial. United States v. Kabot, 295 F. 2d 848, 852 (2 Cir. 1961); United States v. Van Allen, 2 Cir., 288 F. 2d 825, cert. denied 368 U.S. 836, 82 S.Ct. 31, 7 L.Ed.2d 37 (1961), reh. denied 368 U.S. 908, 82 S.Ct. 170, 7 L.Ed.2d 101. He also claims that the sentence was excessive. It was, however, within the statutory limits, and his record of convictions of serious crimes, including the Rubinstein extortion attempt and the Gulf Oil geophysical map…
• Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Jerome, 434 U.S. 241 (U.S. 1978)
  …precedents of this Court, is to postpone consideration of jurisdiction until appellants have had an opportunity to demonstrate that the judgment appealed from does not rest on an independent and adequate state ground. See, e. g., Lynum v. Illinois, 368 U. S. 908 (1961) (consideration of certiorari deferred “to accord counsel for petitioner opportunity to secure a certificate from the Supreme Court of Illinois as to whether the judgment herein was intended to rest on an adequate and independent state ground”…