NARCISSE

v.

AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING CO.

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• King v. E. Airlines, Inc., 536 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …; or as “reckless disregard of the consequences”; or as “a deliberate purpose not to discharge some duty necessary to safety.” Butler, 774 F. 2d at 430, quoting Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. v. Tuller, 292 F. 2d 775, 778-79, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 921, 82 S.Ct. 243, 7 L.Ed.2d 136 (1961). Because the conduct King alleges is exempt from Article 25 liability limitations, the Warsaw Convention does not preclude his claim. We therefore conclude that Count III alleges a cause of action for conduct whic…
• Bourne v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …ther portions of the order. .Under our decisions interrogation, not itself threatening, is not held to be an unfair labor practice unless it meets certain fairly severe standards. N. L. R. B. v. Firedoor Corp., 291 F. 2d 328 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 921, 82 S.Ct. 242, 7 L.Ed.2d 136 (1961); N. L. R. B. v. Syracuse Color Press, Inc., 209 F. 2d 596 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 347 U. S. 966, 74 S.Ct. 777, 98 L.Ed. 1108 (1954); N. L. R. B. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 192 F. 2d 160 (2d Cir. 1951). These inclu…
• Bell v. City OF Milwaukee, 746 F.2d 1205 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …93 n. 14, 36 L.Ed.2d 596; Rosa v. Cantrell, 705 F. 2d 1208 (10th Cir.1982), certiorari denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 85, 78 L.Ed.2d 94; Spence v. Staras, 507 F. 2d 554 (7th Cir.1974); Brazier v. Cherry, 293 F. 2d 401 (5th Cir.1961), certiorari denied, 368 U.S. 921, 82 S.Ct. 243, 7 L.Ed.2d 136. But the more difficult question, the question presented here and addressed by Section 1988 is whether a state law is “inconsistent” with federal civil rights law and therefore does not apply where state law would not al…