ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.

v.

DIXON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (50 total)

• Wallace v. Fla. A & M Univ., 433 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …957, 958 (5th Cir.1972). The university, with reasonable diligence, offered appellant a hearing according him the full panoply of his due process rights. Dixon v. Alabama Board of Education, 294 F. 2d 150, 158 through 159 (5th Cir.1961), cert. den. 368 U.S. 930, 82 S.Ct. 368, 7 L.Ed.2d 193 (1961). However, under Rule 6C3-2.-12(U)(k), the university was only authorized to dismiss Wallace, not expel him. In its brief, the university acknowledges that expulsion was improper. Thus under the powers granted to…
• Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (U.S. 1970)
  …tant to practice before the Board of Tax Appeals); Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F. 2d 605 [*263] (C. A. 5th Cir. 1964) (right to obtain a retail liquor store license); Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F. 2d 150 (C. A. 5th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U. S. 930 (1961) (right to attend a public college). One Court of Appeals has stated: “In a wide variety of situations, it has long been recognized that where harm to the public is threatened, and the private interest infringed is reasonably deemed to be of…
• Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (U.S. 1975)
  …e underlying basis for a suspension, the fact of which is contained in the student’s school record. Since the landmark decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F. 2d 150, cert. denied, 368 U. S. 930 (1961), the lower federal courts have uniformly held the Due Process Clause applicable to decisions made by tax-supported educational institutions to remove a student from the institution long enough for the removal to be classified as an expulsion.…