ENOCHS, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

v.

WILLIAMS PACKING & NAVIGATION CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Atkinson v. Sinclair Ref. Co., 370 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1962)
  …miss Count I, dismissed Count II, and denied the motion to stay (187 F. Supp. [*241] 225). The Court of Appeals upheld the refusal to dismiss or stay Count I, but reversed the dismissal of Count II (290 F. 2d 312), and this Court granted certiorari (368 U.S. 937). I. We have concluded that Count I should not be dismissed or stayed. Count I properly states a cause of action under § 301 and is to be governed by federal law. Local 174 v. Lucas Flour Co., 369 U. S. 95, 102-104; Textile Workers Union v. Lincol…
• Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co., Inc., 370 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1962)
  …anted certiorari to determine whether the case came within the scope of this Court’s holding in Nut Margarine which indicated that § 7421 (a) was not, in the “special and extraordinary facts and circumstances [*3]” of that case,1 intended to apply.2 368 U. S. 937. Respondent corporation (hereinafter referred to as Williams) is engaged in the business of providing trawlers to fishermen who take shrimp, oysters and fish off the Louisiana and Mississippi coasts. It is the Government’s position that these fishe…
• Sinclair Ref. Co. v. Atkinson, 370 U.S. 195 (U.S. 1962)
  …as that taken below. See W. L. Mead, Inc., v. Teamsters Local No. 25, 217 F. 2d 6; Alcoa S. S. Co. v. McMahon, 173 F. 2d 567; In re Third Ave. Transit Corp., 192 F. 2d 971; A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. Seafarers’ International Union. 250 F. 2d 326. 368 U. S. 937. 47 Stat. 73, 29 U. S. C. §113. The allegations of the complaint with regard to the nine occurrences in question are as follows : “(a) On or about July 1, 1957, six employees assigned to the #810 Crude Still stopped work in support of an asserted…