BORNE CHEMICAL CO., INC., ET AL.

v.

MCCLURE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Posey v. United States, 416 F.2d 545 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …quested instructions. Lambert v. United States, 261 F. 2d 799 (5 Cir. 1958); Cain v. United States, 274 F. 2d 598 (5 Cir. 1960); Windisch v. United States, 295 F. 2d 531 (5 Cir. 1961); Sachs v. United States, 293 F. 2d 623 (5 Cir. 1961), cert. den., 368 U.S. 939, 82 S.Ct. 381, 7 L.Ed.2d 338. X SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE The complaint of appellants Bowers, Price and Posey that the evi [*556] deuce is insufficient to support a conviction and that the district court erred in denying the motions for judgment of…
• Donlon Indus., Inc. v. Forte, 402 F.2d 935 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …ords “of this title” include only Title I of the 1933 Act, see 48 Stat. 74, § 11(e) has no application to an action solely under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act, McClure v. Borne Chemical Co., 292 F. 2d 824, 836-837 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 939, 82 S.Ct. 382, 7 L.Ed.2d 339 (1961); see also Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co., 188 F. 2d 783 (2 Cir. 1951). Any power of the court to order an undertaking in this case must therefore derive from the reference in the complaint to § 17 (a) of the 1933…
• In re Data Access Sys. Sec. Litig. Appeal of Tolins & Lowenfels & Roger A. Tolins. Appeal of I. Kahlowsky & Co. & Peter Cunicelli, 843 F.2d 1537 (3d Cir. 1988)
  …ct in the securities industry.” Huddleston, 459 U.S. at 389, 103 S.Ct. at 691; see Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185, 203, 96 S.Ct. 1375, 1385, 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976); McClure v. Borne Chemical Co., 292 F. 2d 824, 834 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 939, 82 S.Ct. 382, 7 L.Ed.2d 339 (1961). In Basic Inc. v. Levinson, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 978, 99 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988), the Court stated that “[t]he modern securities markets, literally involving millions of shares changing hands daily, differ from the fa…