FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION

v.

TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION CO. ET AL.; AND CITY OF PITTSBURGH V. TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• KER et ux. v. California, 374 U.S. 23 (U.S. 1963)
  …without opinion a petition for hearing. This being the first case arriving here since our opinion in Mapp which would afford suitable opportunity for further explication of that holding in the light of intervening experience, we granted certiorari. 368 U. S. 974. We affirm the judgment before us. The state courts’ conviction and affirmance are based on these events, which culminated in the petitioners’ arrests. Sergeant Cook of the Los Angeles County Sber-? iff’s Office, in negotiating the purchase of mari…
• Fed. Power Comm'n v. Tenn. Gas Transmission Co., 371 U.S. 145 (U.S. 1962)
  …r the over-all filed rates in each zone were just and reasonable; therefore, the interim order might result in irretrievable loss to the company. The importance of the question in the administration of the Natural Gas Act led us to grant certiorari, 368 U. S. 974. We have concluded that the issuance of the order was an appropriate exercise of the power granted the Commission by the Act. I. Tennessee Gas does not have a system-wide rate applicable to all services regardless of where performed. It has since…
• Cunningham v. Heinze, 352 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1965)
  …[*3] to the fact that the Supreme Court denied appellant’s petition for certiorari (Cunningham v. State of California, 368 U.S. 933, 82 S.Ct. 370, 7 L.Ed.2d 195, (1961)) while granting review and reversing in other cases (Ker v. State of California, 368 U.S. 974, 82 S.Ct. 480, 7 L.Ed.2d 437 (1962), 374 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 1623, 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963); Fahy v. State of Connecticut, 372 U.S. 928, 83 S.Ct. 871, 9 L.Ed.2d 732 (1963), 375 U.S. 85, 84 S.Ct. 229, 11 L.Ed.2d 171 (1963); Stoner v. California, 374 U.S.…