FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

v.

SUN OIL CO.

Citator

Cited By (67 total)

• United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …85 S.Ct. 188, 13 L.Ed.2d 177; United States v. Dardi, 2 Cir., 1964, 330 F. 2d 316, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845, 85 S.Ct. 50, 13 L.Ed.2d 50 ; United States v. Crosby, 2 Cir., 1961, 294 F. 2d 928, cert. denied sub nom. Mittelman v. United States, 1962, 368 U.S. 984, 82 S.Ct. 599, 7 L.Ed.2d 523. It is a sad commentary upon the morals of our stock market places in general, and the over-the-counter market in particular, that at this late date in the history of federal securities regulation we are called upon once…

  ← 1 / 5 →
• United States v. Doyle, 348 F.2d 715 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …n,” counsel can hardly be unaware of the close connection between a wilful failure to register securities and their fraudulent sale, which this court has often pointed out, United States v. Crosby, 294 F. 2d 928, 944-945 (2 Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 984, 82 S.Ct. 599, 7 L.Ed.2d 523 (1962); United States v. Benjamin, 328 F. 2d 854, 864 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 953, 84 S.Ct. 1631, 12 L.Ed.2d 497 (1964). The principal attack is that, before passing sentence, the court said, “Now counsel has we…
• United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …nak were in “control,” and since the broker-appellants sold for one or more such “issuers,” each was an “underwriter” under the Act. See United States v. Crosby, 294 F. 2d 928, 939-40 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied sub nom. Mittelman v. United States, 368 U.S. 984, 82 S.Ct. 599, 7 L.Ed.2d 523 (1962). Through this circuitous route it is apparent that the crucial issue as to the broker-dealers’ guilt is whether they knew that they were selling for a “control” group. In United States v. Crosby, supra, this Court…