DAWSON, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE,

v.

LUMMUS COMPANY

Citator

Cited By (47 total)

• Zdanok v. The Glidden Co., 327 F.2d 944 (2d Cir. 1964)
  ….S. 229, 233, 65 S.Ct. 631, 89 L.Ed. 911 (1945), but includes many dispositions which, though not final in that sense, have nevertheless been fully litigated. Lummus Co. v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., 297 F. 2d 80, 89 (2 Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 986, 82 S.Ct. 601, 7 L.Ed.2d 524 (1962), and eases cited. As we there said, “ ‘Finality’ in the context here relevant may mean little more than that the litigation of a particular issue has reached such a stage that a court sees no really good reason fo…
• Int'l Prods. Corp. v. Koons, 325 F.2d 403 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …s, 282 F. 2d 165, 169 (2 Cir. 1960); Taylor v. Board of Educ., 288 F. 2d 600, 604 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 940, 82 S.Ct. 382, 7 L.Ed.2d 339 (1961); Lummus Co. v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., 297 F. 2d 80, 84-86 (2 Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 986, 82 S.Ct. 601, 7 L.Ed.2d 524 (1962). These decisions make it plain, for example, that an order sealing a deposition would not be rendered appealable by the addition of a direction to those who attended its taking to refrain from disclosing what th…
• NEW England Power Co. v. Asiatic Petroleum Corp., 456 F.2d 183 (1st Cir. 1972)
  …ng party to go to arbitration. This rejection of what has been called a “broad literal interpretation of 'injunction’ ”, Lummus Co. v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc., 297 F. 2d 80, 86 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied sub nom. Dawson v. Lummus Co., 368 U.S. 986, 82 S.Ct. 601, 7 L.Ed.2d 524 (1962), is amply supported by the history of 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (1). It has the additional advantages, moreover, of maximizing the possibility that the purposes sought to be furthered by the Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C.…

  ← 1 / 2 →