NUNLEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Jenkins v. United States, 420 F.2d 433 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …re any particular ritual, as the Murray opinion recognizes. See also Stephens v. United States, 376 F. 2d 23 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 881, 88 S.Ct. 124, 19 L.Ed.2d 176; and Nunley v. United States, 294 F. 2d 579 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 991, 82 S.Ct. 607, 7 L.Ed. 2d 527. We must weigh the record before the District Court under such interpretations of the old Rule 11 and the practice required in accepting pleas of guilty before its amendment. Jenkins alleged that there was no inquiry w…
• Armour Bailey v. United States, 312 F.2d 679 (10th Cir. 1963)
  …ourt’s information was such that it knew that Bailey fully understood the nature of the charges against him, and entered his plea voluntarily. In this respect, the case is similar to Nunley v. United States, 10 Cir., 294 F. 2d 579, 580, cert. denied 368 U.S. 991, 82 S.Ct. 607, 7 L.Ed.2d 527, where it was said: “Rule 11 does not require any ritualistic ceremonial. A sentencing court does not have to conduct a hearing and make a finding showing compliance with the rule before [*681] accepting any guilty plea…
• Stephens v. United States, 376 F.2d 23 (10th Cir. 1967)
  …im.P., and that his plea was consequently not acceptable as a matter of law. The United States concedes that the sentencing judge did not fully comply with the provisions of Rule 11. In Nunley v. United States, 10 Cir., 294 F. 2d 579, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 991, 82 S.Ct. 607, 7 L.Ed.2d 527, this court held that in cases where the requirements of Rule 11 were not met, appropriate inquiry into the fact of the voluntariness of a plea must be made. Such inquiry was here made and it was specifically found that…