BAILEY ET AL.

v.

PATTERSON ET AL.

U.S. | 1962-02-26

No. 643

369 U.S. 31 Supreme Court of the United States (1962) Negative Treatment

Also reported at: 7 L. Ed. 2d 512 · 82 S. Ct. 549 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 2162 · SCDB 1961-039

Cited by 711 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

A three-judge district court is not required when prior decisions make frivolous any claim that a state statute is unconstitutional on its face. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to determine the authority of the lower court.

Facts & Procedural History

Appellants, Black individuals, sued for nonsegregated transportation services, alleging denial under state law and custom. A three-judge court abstain…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Topics

Class Action Representation State Statutes Racial Segregation Supreme Court Jurisdiction

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Class Action Representation cases and more on FLexlaw

Per_curiam

Per Curiam.

Appellants, Negroes living in Jackson, Mississippi, brought this civil rights action, 28 U.

S. C. § 1343 (3), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, seeking temporary and permanent injunctions to enforce their constitutional rights to nonsegregated service in interstate and intrastate transportation, alleging that such rights had been denied them under color of state statutes, municipal ordinances, and state custom and usage.* A three-judge District Court was convened, 28 U.

S. C. § 2281, and, Circuit Judge Rives dissenting, abstained from further proceedings pending construction of the challenged laws by the state courts. 199 F. Supp.

595. Plaintiffs have appealed, 28 U.

S. C. § 1253; N.

A. A.

C. P. v. Bennett, 360 U. S.

471. We denied a motion to stay the prosecution of a number of criminal cases pending disposition of this appeal. 368 U. S. 346.

Appellants lack standing to enjoin criminal prosecutions under Mississippi’s breach-of-peace statutes, since they do not allege that they , have been prosecuted or threatened with prosecution under them. They cannot represent a class of whom they are not a part. McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 235 U. S. 151, 162-163. But as passengers using the segregated transportation facilities they are aggrieved parties and have standing to enforce their rights to nonsegregated treatment. Mitchell v. United States, 313 U. S. 80, 93; Evers v. Dwyer, 358 U. S. 202.

We have settled beyond question that no State may require racial segregation of interstate or intrastate transportation facilities. Morgan v. Virginia, 328 U. S. 373; Gayle v. Browder, 352 U. S. 903; Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U. S.

454. The question is no longer open; it is foreclosed as a litigable issue.

Section 2281 does not require a three-judge court when the claim that a statute is unconstitutional is wholly insubstantial, legally speaking nonexistent. Ex parte Poresky, 290 U. S. 30; Bell v. Waterfront Comm’n, 279 F. 2d 853, 857-858.

We hold that three judges are similarly not required when, as here, prior decisions make frivolous any claim that a state statute on its face is not unconstitutional. Willis v. Walker, 136 F. Supp. 181; Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board, 138 F. Supp. 336; Kelley v. Board of Education, 139 F. Supp.

578. We denied leave to file petitions for mandamus in Bush, 351 U. S. 948, and from a similar ruling in Booker v. Tennessee Board of Education, 351 U. S.

948. The reasons for convening an extraordinary court are inapplicable in such cases, for the policy behind the three-judge requirement — that a single judge ought not to be empowered to invalidate a state statute under a federal claim — does not apply. The three-judge requirement is a technical one to be narrowly construed, Phillips v. United States, 312 U. S. 246, 251. The statute comes into play only when an injunction is sought “upon the ground of the unconstitutionality” of a statute. There is no such ground when the constitutional issue presented is essentially fictitious. This case is therefore not one “required ... to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges,” 28 U.

S. C. § 1253, and therefore cannot be brought here on direct appeal.

However, we have jurisdiction to determine the authority of the court below and “to make such corrective order as may be appropriate to the enforcement of the limitations which that section imposes,” Gully v. Interstate Natural Gas Co., 292 U. S. 16, 18; Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co. v. Oklahoma Packing Co., 292 U. S. 386, 392; Phillips v. United States, 312 U. S. 246, 254.

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand the case to the District Court for expeditious disposition, in light of this opinion, of the appellants’ claims of right to unsegregated transportation service.

Vacated and remanded.

The statutes in question are Miss. Code, 1942, Tit. 11, §§ 2351, 2351.5, 2351.7, and Tit. 28, §§ 7784, 7785, 7786, 7786-01, 7787, 7787.5.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (195 total)

Howard A. Engle, M.D. v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 945 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 2006)

…. See Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U.S. 393, 403, 95 S.Ct. 553, 42 L.Ed.2d 532 (1975) (“A litigant must be a member of the class which he or she seeks to represent at the time the class action is certified by the district court.”) (citing Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31, 82 S.Ct. 549, 7 L.Ed.2d 512 (1962)); Davis v. Ball Mem’l Hosp. Ass’n, 753 F. 2d 1410, 1420 (7th Cir.1985) (“To be a proper class representative, the named plaintiff must be a member of the class at the time the class action is certified.”). In our…
Maxwell v. The Good Samaritan Hosp. Ass'n, Inc., 195 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)

…ffirmative defense of the tax assessor attempts to plead individual civil rights under the Constitution of the United States. Only persons actually deprived of their individual civil rights can seek redress of such rights. Bailey v. Patterson, 1962, 369 U.S. 31, 82 S.Ct. 549, 7 L.Ed.2d 512; Brown v. Board of Trustees of LaGrange Independent School Dist., 5 C.A.1951, 187 F. 2d 20; United States v. Biloxi Municipal School District, D.C.S.D. Miss.1963, 219 F.Supp. 691 (affirmed, 5 C.A.1964, 326 F. 2d 237). A…
Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (U.S. 1970)

…g segregation, euphemistically termed ‘separation.’ ” See also Lewis v. Greyhound Corp., 199 F. Supp. 210 (D. C. M. D. Ala. 1961); Bailey v. Patterson, 199 F. Supp. 595, 609-622 (D. C. S. D. Miss. 1961) (Rives, J., dissenting), vacated and remanded, 369 U. S. 31 (1962). See Donnell v. State, 48 Miss. 661, 680-681 (1873): “Among those customs which we call the common law, that have come down to us from the remote past, are rules which have a special application to those who sustain a quasi public relation…

Previewing 3 of 195 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.