KEMP
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1962-05-14
No. 311
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case., Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
369 U.S. 661 Supreme Court of the United States (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Remand In Forma Pauperis Writ Of Certiorari

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Remand cases and more on FLexlaw

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cruz v. Hauck, 404 U.S. 59 (U.S. 1971)
    …United States, 387 U. S. 90 (1967); Robinson v. United States, 372 U. S. 527 (1963); Jones v. United States, 371 U. S. 25 (1962); Gilliam v. United States, 370 U. S. 727 (1962); Garrett v. United States, 369 U. S. 662 (1962); Kemp v. United States, 369 U. S. 661 (1962); Coppedge v. United States, 369 U. S. 438 (1962); see 14 cases prior to Coppedge cited id., at 440-441, n. 1. See also Roberts v. LaVallee, 389 U. S. 40 (1967); Long v. District Court of Iowa, 385 U. S. 192 (1966); Draper v. Washington, 372…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw