SPECTOR

v.

LADD, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• Hughes v. Washington, 389 U.S. 290 (U.S. 1967)
  …o any boundary is based on a broad question as to the general definition of the shoreline or on a particularized problem relating to the ownership of accretion. See United States v. Washington, 294 F. 2d 830, 832 (C. A. 9th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U. S. 817 (1962). We therefore find no significant difference between Borax and the present case. Recognizing the difficulty of distinguishing Borax, respondent urges us to reconsider it. Borax itself, as well as United States v. Oregon, supra, and many othe…
• Or. ex rel. State Land Bd. v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co., 429 U.S. 363 (U.S. 1977)
  …, since the Government would no longer have been able to convey rights to a boundary adjacent to the sea if it turned over trust lands to the Indian beneficiaries. Id., at 5-6; cf. United States v. Washington, 294 F. 2d 830 (CA9 1961), cert. denied, 369 U. S. 817 (1962). But the problem with the Indian trust lands was merely “exemplary” because the state decision in Hughes “restrains the government from disposing of the full measure of its title in connection with any program or policy which it may wish to…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Donruss Co., 393 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1969)
  …. . . [that] presumption ... is well nigh destroyed if . . . [it] is saddled with requirement of proof of ‘the primary or dominant purpose’ of the accumulation.” Barrow Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner, 294 F. 2d 79, 82 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U. S. 817 (1962). The cases cited by respondent do not convince us to the contrary. For the most part, they lack detailed analysis of the precise problem. Perhaps the leading case for respondent’s position is Young Motor Co. v. Commissioner, 281 F. 2d 488 (C…

  ← 1 / 2 →