TORRES
v.
CALIFORNIA
TORRES
CALIFORNIA
369 U.S. 838
Supreme Court of the United States (1962)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Indus. Union Dep't, AFL-CIO v. Bingham, 570 F.2d 965 (D.C. Cir. 1977)…AT&T v. FCC, 519 F. 2d 322, 325 (2d Cir. 1975) (citing cases from other circuits). This power must be exercised sparingly, but its existence militates against a restrictive reading of § 2112(a). Ball v. NLRB, 299 F. 2d 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 838, 82 S.Ct. 868, 7 L.Ed.2d 843 (1962), was addressed to determination of the court of first filing. It does not consider the question of the basis on which that court may transfer elsewhere in the interest of justice. . Thus, Justice Goldberg noted i…
-
Int'l Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 373 F.2d 671 (D.C. Cir. 1967)…he relief contemplated, and any shortfall is inconsequential even though it does not eliminate the technical status of “aggrievement.” Ball v. N.L.R.B., 299 F. 2d 683, 689 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Northern Virginia Sun Pub. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 369 U.S. 838, 82 S. Ct. 868, 7 L.Ed.2d 843 (1962). The possibility of a transfer on this ground is not to be taken as permitting trial by affidavit on the issue of motivation. It is reserved for the special case where the “inconsequential” character of the defic…
-
Cohen v. United States, 363 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1966)…t of guilty, whether at the hands of court or jury, is not to be overturned unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, Newsom v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 335 F. 2d 237; Curtis v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 297 F. 2d 639, cert. den. 369 U.S. 838, 82 S.Ct. 867, 7 L.Ed. 2d 842, and numerous other eases which are digested in Criminal Law 1159 (2)i, West’s Modern Federal Practice Digest. Of course, the precedents are replete with instances in which, after thorough consideration of the evidence,…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence