LOTTIE E. MAHIN, SINGLE,
v.
D. POWELL MAHIN

Fla. | 1936-07-22
Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.
125 Fla. 223 Florida Supreme Court (1936) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 169 So. 665
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of Braswell versus Downs, 11 Fla. 62; McCorry v. Payne, 94 Fla. 209, 113 Sou. Rep. 212.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Nolan v. Lunsford, 142 Fla. 671 (Fla. 1940)
    …t was without error in making and entering the order denying the motion of the defendant to dismiss. See Schmidt v. Kibben, 100 Fla. 1684, 132 So. 194; Miami Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Bell, 101 Fla. 1291, 133 So. 547; Burnett v. Dollison, 125 Fla. 254, 169 So. 665. The next question to be determined is whether or not the covenants, supra, appearing in the vendor’s sales agreement are dependent or independent. It is the contention of counsel for appellant that the covenants, supra, are dependent and it was no…
  • Neva Richards v. Hasty, 158 Fla. 459 (Fla. 1947)
    …the cloud on the title resulting from the recordation thereof. On the contrary, several cases hold that a bill lies for this purpose, if the seller offers to do equity, as was offered in the case now before us. In Barnett v. Dollison, 125 Fla. 254, 169 So. 665, the Court said in part: “The original purchase and sale agreement having been recorded by the defendant, became and is a cloud on the complainant’s title, and while, as. heretofore pointed out, the amended bill is not sufficient as a basis for for…
  • Huguley v. Hall, 141 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962)
    …Sloan, 25 Fla. 53, 5 So. 603. To support the per curiam order of af-firmance, my brethren cite Taylor v. Rawlins (1923), 86 Fla. 279, 97 So. 714, 35 A.L.R. 271; Ganaway v. Henderson (Fla.App.1958), 103 So. 2d 693; Barnett v. Dollison, 125 Fla. 254, 169 So. 665; and Herrera Y. Nogueira v. Helker et ux., Third District Court of Appeal, 139 So. 2d 895. I suggest that these cases are not in point. In Taylor the plaintiff vendors of real property, having repossessed themselves of the property pursuant to defe…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw