COOPER

v.

PATE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Reddick v. State, 190 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
  …369 U.S. 825, 82 S.Ct. 840, 7 L.Ed.2d 789, where the test of availability of Section 2255 was whether defendant had been “deprived of substance of fair trial”; United States v. Gaitan, D.C.Colo.1960, 189 F. Supp. 674, aff. 295 F. 2d 277, cert. den. 369 U.S. 857, 82 S.Ct. 939, 8 L.Ed.2d 15, where the test was whether the error was “of such grave character as to have deprived defendant of a fair trial”; Simmons v. United States, C.A.N.J.1962, 302 F. 2d 71, where it was such as to have deprived defendant of a…
• Collins v. Fla. Towing Corp., 262 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)
  …error as unduly prejudicial, thus finding that the discretion of the trial court was not within ‘reasonable limits.’ The opinion quotes the opinion in Leach v State (1961, Fla) 132 So 2d 329, cert den 368 US 1005, 7 L Ed 2d 543, 82 S Ct 636, reh den 369 US 857, 8 L Ed 2d 16, 82 S Ct 938, as stating the correct rule.” For many years the courts of Florida have recognized and applied this prevailing rule. In Perper v. Edell, 44 So. 2d 78 (Fla.1949), the Supreme Court of Florida said: “We conceive the rule…
• Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1962)
  …, 242 F. 2d 338, vacated, 354 U. S. 521 (1957), remanded to District Court for settling transcript (December 1960), appeal in forma pauperis granted by District Court (May 1961), conviction affirmed on the merits, 292 F. 2d 789 (1961), cert. denied, 369 U. S. 857 (April 1962); Ellis: Indicted (April 1956), tried (September 1956), appeal in forma pauperis denied, 101 U. S. App. D. C. 386, 249 F. 2d 478 (1957), vacated, 356 U. S. 674 (1958), conviction affirmed on the merits, 105 U. S. App. D. C. 86, 264 F…