LONG

v.

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By

• White Motor Co. v. United States, 372 U.S. 253 (U.S. 1963)
  …ions, applicable to distributors and dealers alike, are claimed by appellee to be per se violations of the Sherman Act.2 The District Court adopted that view and granted summary judgment accordingly. 194 F. Supp. 562. We noted probable jurisdiction. 369 U. S. 858. See 15 U. S. C. § 29. Appellant, in arguing for a trial of the case on the merits, made the following representations to the District Court: the territorial clauses are necessary in order for appellant to compete with those who make other competi-…
• Mister Ralpho v. Bell, 569 F.2d 607 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …ere is nothing unusual in whittling finality language down to size. . . ”); 4 K. Davis, Administrative Law § 28.01 at 2-3 (1958). . Caulfield v. Department of Agriculture, 293 F. 2d 217, 228 (5th Cir. 1961) (Wisdom J., dissenting), cert. dismissed, 369 U.S. 858, 82 S.Ct. 946, 8 L.Ed.2d 16 (1962). . B. Schwartz, Administrative Law § 147 at 439 (1976). . See cases cited infra at notes 77-78, 103— 108. Cf. Switchmen’s Union v. National Mediation Bd., 320 U.S. 297, 300, 64 S.Ct. 95, 97, 88 L.Ed. 61, 64 (1943…
• Murphy v. Colonial Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 388 F.2d 609 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …n v. Alleghany Corp., 133 F.Supp. 858, 864 (S.D.N.Y.1955); cf. Bitterman v. L. & N. R.R., 207 U.S. 205, 224-226, 28 S.Ct. 91, 52 L.Ed. 171 (1907). . In Caulfield v. United States Department of Agriculture, 293 F. 2d 217, 222 n. 10 (1961), dismissed 369 U.S. 858, 82 S.Ct. 946, 8 L.Ed.2d 16 (1962), the Fifth Circuit, en banc, adopted the “commerce clause” test in holding a suit under the Soil Bank Act to fall under § 1337. . Professor Wright has argued that, in spite of this legislative history, Jones Act s…