CASIAS

v.

COLORADO

Citator

Cited By

• Coughlin v. Capitol Cement Co., 571 F.2d 290 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …not giving the requested instruction. See Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F. 2d at 374 (“A mere scintilla of evidence is insufficient to present a question for the jury.”); Dores v. Anderson, 295 F. 2d 496, 497 (5th Cir. 1961) (per curiam), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 862, 82 S.Ct. 952, 8 L.E.2d 19 (1962). Plaintiffs’ remaining contentions relative to the court’s charge can be answered without extensive discussion. First, it is argued that the court should not have instructed the jury that the availability of an alt…
• Near v. Cunningham, 313 F.2d 929 (4th Cir. 1963)
  …the formal entries on the record showed that the prisoner was personally present at every stage of the trial, and that under its rules the record may not be controverted. The Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari. Near v. Cunningham, 369 U.S. 862, 82 S.Ct. 951, 8 L.Ed.2d 19 (1962). Near then brought the instant petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 et seq. The petition alleges two grounds for issuance of the writ. It is claimed that petitioner was denied due process…
• Wiman v. Argo, 308 F.2d 674 (5th Cir. 1962)
  …t 137 So. 2d 755, extended on rehearing at 137 So. 2d 756, 757. The Supreme Court of Alabama denied certiorari, 137 So. 2d 757, 758, and on April 23, 1962, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in a cause entitled Argo v. Alabama, 369 U.S. 862, 82 S.Ct. 952, 8 L.Ed.2d 20. These coram nobis proceedings, .to which the district court probably intended to refer, lead us to agree that Argo has exhausted the remedies available to him in the State courts. As to the petitioner’s appeal, the ques…