TEXAS

v.

NEW JERSEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• FAY v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 (U.S. 1963)
  …to appeal was to be deemed a waiver of his claim that he had been unconstitutionally convicted. The Court of Appeals rejected this argument on the ground that no waiver could be inferred in the circumstances. Id., at 351-352. We granted certiorari. 369 U. S. 869. We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals but reach that court’s result by a different course of reasoning. We hold: (1) Federal courts have power under the federal habeas statute to grant relief despite the applicant’s failure to [*399] have…
• Parisi v. Davidson, 405 U.S. 34 (U.S. 1972)
  …76, 338 U. S. 197. Some members of the Court have felt that, absent statutory authorization, the Court may not even transfer a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus to a lower court. But that view has not prevailed. See Chaapel v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 869. See Billings v. Truesdell, 321 U. S. 542. This case involved a Selective Service registrant whose conscientious objector claim was rejected by the service. Billings subsequently reported as ordered for induction, but refused to take the required o…
• Brubaker v. Dickson, 310 F.2d 30 (9th Cir. 1962)
  …, [*40] 157, 7 L.Ed.2d 114 (1961); Whitley v. Steiner, 293 F. 2d 895 (4th Cir. 1961). . See, e. g., United States ex rel. Seals v. Wiman, 304 F. 2d 53, 67-69 (5th Cir. 1962); United States ex rel. Noia v. Fay, 300 F. 2d 345 (2d Cir.), cert. granted 369 U.S. 869, 82 S.Ct. 1140, 8 L.Ed.2d 274 (1962), 62 Colum.L.Rev. 1077 (1962); United States ex rel. Goldsby v. Harpole, 263 F. 2d 71 (5th Cir. 1959). Cf. Massey v. Moore, 348 U.S. 105, 75 S.Ct. 145, 99 L.Ed. 135 (1954); Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 503, 73 S.…