EDWARDS ET AL.

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1963)
  …icted in a magistrate’s court in Columbia, South Carolina, of the [*230] common-law crime of breach of the peace. Their convictions were ultimately affirmed by the South Carolina Supreme Court, 239 S. C. 339, 123 S. E. 2d 247. We granted certiorari, 369 U. S. 870, to consider the claim that these convictions cannot be squared with the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. There was no substantial conflict in the trial evidence.1 Late in the morning of March 2, 1961, the petitioners, high s…
• Wisconsin v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 373 U.S. 294 (U.S. 1963)
  …s’ past increases and of its present rates. To have failed to do so, he believed, was a clear abuse of discretion. We granted certiorari because of the importance of this case [*303] in the administration and future operation of the Natural Gas Act. 369 U. S. 870. The arguments of the parties, both in their briefs and at the bench, have covered a broad range of subjects, including a number of other administrative actions and proceedings — past, present, and future — that are not before us today. We lay thes…
• Hunt v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 306 F.2d 334 (5th Cir. 1962)
  …Commission’s decision in the Phillips case. State of Wisconsin v. F. P. C., 16175; Long Island Lighting Co. v. F. P. C., 16177; People of the State of California v. F. P. C., 16180, D.C.Cir., 1961, 303 F. 2d 380. With certiorari having been granted, 369 U.S. 870, 82 S.Ct. 1138, 1139, 8 L.Ed.2d 275, the decision of the Supreme Court will be portentous. . In seeking the increased appropriations (note 15, supra), the chairman is reported as testifying that the present Permiam Basin area rate proceeding would…