NAVARRO
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1962-05-21
No. 893
369 U.S. 889 Supreme Court of the United States (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Zegers v. Zegers, Inc., 365 F.2d 156 (7th Cir. 1966)
    …y, for infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 2,869,184 owned by Zegers, Inc. The district court held the patent valid and infringed, and its decision was affirmed on appeal.2 Zegers, Inc. v. Zegers, 299 F. 2d 769 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 369 U.S. 889, 82 S.Ct. 1163, 8 L.Ed.2d 289 (1962). In that suit the inventive disclosure of the Zegers, Inc. patent was the concept of releasably or demountably securing combination sash balance and weatherstrip units to a window frame or jamb through the use of…
  • Zegers v. Zegers, Inc., 458 F.2d 726 (7th Cir. 1972)
    …nd the case is remanded for the entry of judgment in the amount of $17,500 as recommended in the special master’s report. Each party shall bear his own costs on this appeal. . See Zegers, Inc. v. Zegers, 299 F. 2d 769 (7th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 889, 82 S.Ct. 1163, 8 L.Ed.2d 289; Zegers v. Zegers, Inc., 365 F. 2d 156 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 948, 87 S.Ct. 320, 17 L.Ed.2d 226. . A. 222. More precisely, the district court held that plaintiff should recover a rea-onable royalty mea…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw