JAMES ALLEN MORRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1966-06-09
No. H-402
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL^ DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
187 So. 2d 368 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The appellate court granted the Public Defender's motion to withdraw as counsel.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of breaking and entering and appealed. The Public Defender, appointed to represent him, reviewed the record and found no justi…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James Allen Morris, acting in proper person, filed his notice of appeal from a judgment of conviction for the crime of breaking and entering. The Public Defender was appointed to represent him in the trial of this cause and to represent him in this appeal.

The Public Defender has filed a petition seeking an order dismissing the appeal and relieving him as attorney of record or in the alternative, allowing the appellant to proceed in proper person. In his petition he alleges that he represented appellant in his trial, and after having carefully reviewed the transcript of record on appeal *369finds no justiciable issue which he feels should be presented on appeal. The Public Defender requests that he be discharged and released as appointed counsel of record on appeal.

Upon the authority of McNealy v. State, 183 So.2d 738 (Fla.App.lst, 1966), the motion of counsel to withdraw as attorney for appellant on this appeal is granted. This court will not, however, attempt to make a sua sponte determination of the merits of this appeal. Twenty days from the date on which this opinion is filed will be ' granted appellant within which to file any assignments of error he may conceive to be grounds for reversal of the judgment appealed, and upon filing of same, this appeal will proceed according to appropriate rules governing appeals.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL^ DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Morris v. State, 189 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)
    …2d 738 (Fla.App.1st, 1966); denied the motion to dismiss, and granted the defendant-appellant an additional 20 days within which to file any assignments of error he might conceive to be grounds for reversal of the judgment appealed. Morris v. State, 187 So. 2d 368 (Fla.App.1st, 1966). The 20 days have elapsed but the Attorney General of Florida has timely filed a petition for reconsideration of this court’s decision, supra, citing Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477, 83 S.Ct. 768, 9 L.Ed.2d 892 and Douglas v. People…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw