GRUMMAN
v.
UNITED STATES
GRUMMAN
UNITED STATES
370 U.S. 288
Supreme Court of the United States (1962)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 8 L. Ed. 2d 501 · 82 S. Ct. 1560 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1075 · SCDB 1961-101
Cited by 8 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749.
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749, 779, 781.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Francesco Foti v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 308 F.2d 779 (2d Cir. 1962)…though subject to deportation shall have the order of deportation withheld, is a different matter,” Milutin v. Bouchard, 299 F. 2d 50, 51 (3 Cir. 1962), cert. granted and judgment vacated on consent of Solicitor General, 370 U.S. 292, 82 S.Ct. 1562, 8 L.Ed.2d 501 (1962). In fact, the withholding and suspending sections outline no procedure, let alone requiring use of the procedure prescribed by § 242(b), to which the 1961 judicial review amendment is keyed. Whereas a determination of deportability must res…
-
Sovich v. Esperdy, 319 F.2d 21 (2d Cir. 1963)…Waterman’s elaboration of the governing standards, and also to accord to Sovich the advantage of the new procedures established by regulations in force subsequent to the date of bis hearing (see Milutin v. Bouchard, 1962, 370 U.S. 292, 82 S.Ct. 156, 8 L.Ed.2d 501, vacating and remanding, 3 Cir., 1962, 299 F. 2d 50; Zupicich v. Esperdy, S.D.N.Y., 1962, 207 F.Supp. 574, 580, fns. 13-14), it seems just that Sovich should receive a new hearing.…1 / 3
-
Veljko Stanisic v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 393 F.2d 539 (9th Cir. 1968)…alization Service, 386 F. 2d 750 (2d Cir. 1967); Sovich v. Esperdy, 319 F. 2d 21 (2d Cir. 1963); Blagaic v. Flagg, 304 F. 2d 623 (7th Cir. 1962); Milutin v. Bouchard, 299 F. 2d 50 (3d Cir. 1962); vacated on other grounds 370 U.S. 292, 82 S.Ct. 1562, 8 L.Ed.2d 501 (1962); Dunat v. Hurney, 297 F. 2d 744 (3d Cir. 1962); Couto v. Shaughnessy, 218 F. 2d 758 (2d Cir. 1955); United States ex rel. Dolenz v. Shaughnessy, 200 F. 2d 288 (2d Cir. 1952); Matter of P, 9 I.N. 368 (1961); Matter of A, 9 I.N. 356 (1961). .…
Authorities Cited
- Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 (U.S. 1962)