HARTMAN
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1962-06-25
No. 447
Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case., Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749, 779, 781.
370 U.S. 724 Supreme Court of the United States (1962) Caution
Also reported at: 8 L. Ed. 2d 801 · 82 S. Ct. 1574 · SCDB 1961-118 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 860
Cited by 30 cases
Topics
In Forma Pauperis Petition For Writ Of Certiorari

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse In Forma Pauperis cases and more on FLexlaw

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the motion for leave to supplement the petition for certiorari and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749; Silber v. United States, ante, p. 717.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749, 779, 781.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

  • Schiers v. The People OF the State OF Cal., 333 F.2d 173 (9th Cir. 1964)
    …ntentions to the state courts also in a motion to the court of appeal to recall his remittitur. However, we do not have in the record on this petition any showing as to what these contentions were. . See Elchuk v. United States (1962) 370 U.S. 722, 82 S.Ct. 1574, 8 L.Ed.2d 802, where on the suggestion of the Solicitor General, the matter was remanded “for further proceedings in which the petitioner is to be accorded the opportunity to present oral argument on the merits of his appeal, either personally or t…
  • Wheeler v. Beto, 407 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1969)
    …PER CURIAM: Since appellant is without counsel and none has been appointed, the case cannot be orally heard, see Elchuk v. United States, 1962, 370 U.S. 722, 82 S.Ct. 1574, 8 L.Ed.2d 802, and, accordingly, the case is properly placed on the summary calendar under Fifth Circuit Rule 18. This appeal is from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a Texas prisoner convicted of possession of marihu…
  • Ghazi Abraham v. Louie L. Wainwright, 407 F.2d 826 (5th Cir. 1969)
    …AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge: Appellant is without counsel, and none having been appointed, the case cannot be orally heard. See Elchuk v. United States, 370 U.S. 722, 82 S.Ct. 1574, 8 L.Ed.2d 802 (1962). Accordingly, the case is properly placed on the summary calendar under Fifth Circuit Rule 18. The appellant is a Florida state prisoner serving a sentence for murder in the second degree. The conviction was affirmed upon dire…

Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw