EXPOSITION PRESS, INC., ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• Atkinson v. State, 317 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
  …Supreme Court did not spell out the “particular circumstances” which would support a refusal to permit the witness to testify, this was discussed in the opinion in United, States v. Schaefer, 299 F. 2d 625, 14 ALR 3rd 1 (7th Cir. 1962), cert. denied 370 U.S. 917, 82 S.Ct. 1553, 8 L.Ed.2d 497 (1962), wherein the court stated, at 631: “However, we interpret Holder to mean the court may not disqualify the witness merely because he disobeys the rule but that this alternative is available if particular circumst…
• United States v. Benjamin, 328 F.2d 854 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …ties Act to be satisfied in fraud cases by proof of representations which due diligence would have shown to be untrue. Stone v. United States, 113 F. 2d 70, 75 (6 Cir. 1940); United States v. Schaefer, 299 F. 2d 625, 629, 632 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 917, 82 S.Ct. 1553, 8 L.Ed.2d 497 (1962). In our complex society the accountant’s certificate and the lawyer’s opinion can be instruments for inflicting pecuniary loss more potent than the chisel or the crowbar. Of course, Congress did not mean that any…
• Cinderella Career & Finishing Schs., Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 425 F.2d 583 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
  …f the evidence in the record. See Stauffer Laboratories, Inc. v. FTC, 343 F. 2d 75, 79 (9th Cir. 1965); Bakers Franchise Corp. v. FTC, 302 F. 2d 258, 261 (3d Cir. 1962); Exposition Press, Inc. v. FTC, 295 F. 2d 869, 872 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 917, 82 S.Ct. 1554, 8 L.Ed.2d 497 (1962); E. F. Drew & Co. v. FTC, 235 F. 2d 735, 741 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 969, 77 S.Ct. 360, 1 L.Ed. 2d 323 (1957); Rhodes Pharmacal Co. v. FTC, 208 F. 2d 382, 387 (7th Cir. 1953), rev’d in part on othe…