GRAY, CHAIRMAN OF THE GEORGIA STATE DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, ET AL.
v.
SANDERS

U.S. | 1962-06-18
No. 959
Mr. Justice Harlan would note probable jurisdiction and deny the motion to advance, with leave to the appellants to apply to this Court for a stay of the injunction order of the District Court pending determination of this appeal.
370 U.S. 921 Supreme Court of the United States (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (U.S. 1963)
    …t a county than exists against any State in the conduct of national elections.6 Thereafter the Democratic Committee voted to hold the 1962 primary election for the statewide offices mentioned on a popular vote basis. We noted probable jurisdiction. 370 U. S. 921. II. We agree with the District Court that the action of this party in the conduct of its primary constitutes state action within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. Judge Sibley, writing for the court in Chapman v. King, 154 F. 2d 460, showe…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw