SOBLEN
v.
UNITED STATES
SOBLEN
UNITED STATES
370 U.S. 944
Supreme Court of the United States (1962)
Caution
Cited by 36 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (30 total)
-
Willingham v. Morgan, 395 U.S. 402 (U.S. 1969)…er color” of federal office, regardless of whether the suit could originally have been brought in a federal court. Federal jurisdiction rests on a “federal interest in the matter,” Poss v. Lieberman, 299 F. 2d 358, 359 (C. A. 2d Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U. S. 944 (1962), the very basic interest in the enforcement of federal law through federal officials. Viewed in this context, the ruling of the court below cannot be sustained. The federal officer removal statute is not “narrow” or “limited.” Colorado v. Sy…1 / 2
-
Jenkins v. United GAS Corp. & Allan B. Caldwell, 400 F.2d 28 (5th Cir. 1968)…denied, 354 U.S. 921 [77 S.Ct. 1380, 1 L.Ed.2d 1436] (1957); Mannings v. Board of Public Inst, of Hillsborough County, Fla., 277 F. 2d 370 (5th Cir. 1960); Nortlicross v. Board of Ed. of City of Memphis, 302 F. 2d 818 (6th Cir. 1962), cert, denied, 370 U.S. 944 [82 S.Ct. 1586, 8 L.Ed .2d 810] (1962); Frasier v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of N. C., 134 F.Supp. 589 (M.D.N.C.1955, 3-judge court), aff’d, 350 U.S. 979 [76 S.Ct. 467, 100 L.Ed. 848] (1956). Subdivision (b) (2) is not limited to civil-rights cas…
-
United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1965)…er factors supporting this exercise of judicial discretion. Suffice it to say that we think the denial of this motion was proper. United States v. Soblen, S.D.N.Y., 1961, 203 F.Supp. 542, 568-569, affirmed, 2 Cir., 1962, 301 F. 2d 236, cert. denied, 370 U.S. 944, 82 S.Ct. 1585, 8 L.Ed.2d 810; United States v. Bentvena, 2 Cir., 1963, 319 F. 2d 916, 941, cert. denied sub nom. Ormento v. United States, 375 U.S. 940, 84 S.Ct. 345, 11 L.Ed.2d 271. The significance of this ruling here, however, is that, when cert…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 30 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence