JACKSON

v.

COCHRAN, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …er factors supporting this exercise of judicial discretion. Suffice it to say that we think the denial of this motion was proper. United States v. Soblen, S.D.N.Y., 1961, 203 F.Supp. 542, 568-569, affirmed, 2 Cir., 1962, 301 F. 2d 236, cert. denied, 370 U.S. 944, 82 S.Ct. 1585, 8 L.Ed.2d 810; United States v. Bentvena, 2 Cir., 1963, 319 F. 2d 916, 941, cert. denied sub nom. Ormento v. United States, 375 U.S. 940, 84 S.Ct. 345, 11 L.Ed.2d 271. The significance of this ruling here, however, is that, when cert…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Tex. Trading & Milling Corp. v. Fed. Republic OF Nigeria & Cent. Bank of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir. 1981)
  …rom the jurisdictional ruling. All appeals are taken formally from the judgment below except in Texas Trading. That appeal is taken from Judge Cannella’s order, but the error is harmless. See Poss v. Lieberman, 299 F. 2d 358 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 944, 82 S.Cti 1585, 8 L.Ed.2d 810 (1962). . See also Senate Judiciary Committee, Define Jurisdiction of U. S. Courts in Suits Against Foreign States, S.Rep. No. 1310, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 8-9. The House and Senate Committees filed identical reports, an…