STATE, EX REL. CITY OF VERO BEACH,
v.
A. C. MACCONNELL, AS CITY CLERK OF CITY OF VERO BEACH
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case, a companion to another involving a water system, concerns the issuance of revenue certificates against the net revenues of an electric power system. The court's decision relies on prior rulings regarding similar revenue certificates.
Yes, the City of Vero Beach can issue revenue certificates against the net revenues of its electric power system.
“On authority of the opinion and judgment in the above mentioned case and cases therein cited, the motion to quash should be denied and the peremptory writ of mandamus should issue and it is so ordered.”
This quote establishes the basis for the court's decision, relying on precedent from a companion case.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe City of Vero Beach sought to issue revenue certificates against the net revenues of its electric power system. This case is a companion to another…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Revenue Certificates cases and more on FLexlaw
-This: .is a companion' case • to that other case entitled State of Florida ex relatione City of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Relator, v. A. C. MacConnell, as City Clerk of-City, of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Respondent, the only difference being that the revenue' certificates in.this case are sought to be issued against the net = revenues of an electric power *252system while in the other case they are sought to be issued against the net revenues of a water supply system. See Williams v. Town of Dunnellon filed this term.
On authority of the opinion and judgment in the above mentioned case and cases therein cited, the motion to quash should be denied and the peremptory writ of mandamus should issue and it is so ordered.
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
concurring upon the principle announced in his specially concurring opinion in the companion case this day filed.
Ellis, P. J.,
concurring upon the principle announced in his specially concurring opinion in the companion case this day filed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brooks v. City of Jacksonville, 127 Fla. 564 (Fla. 1937)…Rep. 492; Williams v. Town of Dunnellon, 125 Fla. 114, 169 Sou. Rep. 631; Taachy v. City of Wauchula, 125 Fla. 150, 169 Sou. Rep. 640; Voorhees v. City of Moore Haven, 125 Fla. 149, 169 Sou. Rep 641; State, ex rel. City of Vero Beach v. MacConnell, 125 Fla. 251, 169 Sou. Rep. 657; Roach v. City of Tampa, 125 Fla. 62, 169 Sou. Rep. 627; State, ex rel. City of Sarasota, v. Richards, 125 Fla. 145, 169 Spu. Rep. 643; Taylor v. City of Miami, 125 Fla. 144, 169 Sou. Rep. 644; Boynton v. City of Safety Harbor, 12…
-
State v. City of DeLand, 135 Fla. 540 (Fla. 1938)…124 Fla. 659, 169 So. 356; Hygema v. City of Sebring, 124, Fla. 683, 169 So. 366; Boykin v. Town of River Junction, 124 Fla. 827, 169 So. 492; Williams v. Town of Dunnellon, 125 Fla. 114, 169 So. 631; State, ex rel. City of Vero Beach, v. McConnell, 125 Fla. 251, 169 So. 628; Roach v. City of Tampa, 125 Fla. 62, 169 So. 627; State, ex rel. City of Arcadia, v. Daniel, 125 Fla. 151, 169 So. 645; Blocker v. City of St. Petersburg, 125 Fla. 156, 169 So. 647; City of Clearwater v. Green, 125 Fla. 157, 169 So. 64…