KOPTIK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. William P. Catena, M.D., 500 F.2d 1319 (3d Cir. 1974)
  …false claim to an agency of the United States. While the indictment did not by its terms refer specifically to § 2(b), but rather referred only to § 287, this omission is not fatal. United States v. Koptik, 300 F. 2d 19, 22 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 957, 82 S.Ct. 1609, 8 L.Ed.2d 823 (1962); Londos v. United States, 240 F. 2d 1, 7 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 949, 77 S.Ct. 860, 1 L.Ed.2d 858 (1957). In terms of giving notice to the defendant of the crime for which he is charged, the bare citat…
• Peterson v. United States, 405 F.2d 102 (8th Cir. 1968)
  …aived any error as to both by failing to raise them below.7 We find no reason to grant relief from the waiver and, in any event, [*108] the defendants’ contention is without merit. See, United States v. Koptik, 300 F. 2d 19 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 957, 82 S.Ct. 1609, 8 L.Ed.2d 823 (1962); Pereira v. United States, 202 F. 2d 830 (5th Cir. 1953), aff’d, 347 U.S. 1, 74 S.Ct. 358, 98 L.Ed 435 (1954). EXEMPTION UNDER § 4705(c) (4) The defendants’ third contention is that the sale of narcotics fell w…
• Vern Mac Thogmartin v. United States, 313 F.2d 589 (8th Cir. 1963)
  …S. 1, 8, 74 S.Ct. 358, 98 L.Ed. 435; Nye & Nissen v. United States, 1949, 336 U.S. 613, 618-619, 69 S.Ct. 766, 93 L.Ed. 919; Mays v. United States, 8 Cir., 1958, 261 F. 2d 662, 664; United States v. Koptik, 7 Cir., 1962, 300 F. 2d 19, 22, cert. den. 370 U.S. 957, 82 S.Ct. 1609, 8 L.Ed.2d 823. The defense would have us infer that because the motel records show Thogmartin’s presence in Des Moines on July 1 to 3, 1961, and because Mrs. Robertson testified that her delivery of the bonds to Thogmartin took plac…