CEDILLO

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Marshall v. United States, 321 F.2d 897 (10th Cir. 1963)
  …he second time from the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He again attacks the validity of the sentence imposed but this was determined adversely to him on his prior appeal. Marshall v. United States, 10 Cir., 299 F. 2d 141, certiorari denied 370 U.S. 958, 82 S.Ct. 1606, 8 L.Ed.2d 824. Additionally he asserts that he was unconstitutionally denied counsel at the time of his first arraignment. The record shows that at arraignment the court advised Marshall of his right to counsel and Marshall replied…
• United States v. Weeks, 327 F.2d 656 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …ised upon prior mail theft, it was not error, despite the dismissal of the first count, to receive evidence of theft to prove the second [*657] count, a distinct indictable offense. Marshall v. United States, 299 F. 2d 141 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 958, 82 S.Ct. 1606, 8 L.Ed.2d 824 (1962). Finally, when viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, cf. United States v. Kane, 322 F. 2d 787 (2d Cir. 1963), it cannot be said that the evidence adduced at the trial did not support beyond a rea…
• Luciano Cedillo v. Beto, 399 F.2d 667 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …received the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment as a third felonious offender on June 20, 1961. Upon direct appeal, which he prosecuted pro se, the judgment was affirmed. Cedillo v. State, 1962, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 532, 352 S.W. 2d 736, cert. denied, 370 U.S. 958, 82 S.Ct. 1611, 8 L.Ed.2d 824. The appellant has contended that he, an indigent person, was denied representation of counsel in his direct appeal from the judgment of conviction. Since we hold that this point is well taken, we find it unnecessary t…