ALABAMA ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (42 total)

• England v. La. State Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 375 U.S. 411 (U.S. 1964)
  …ce Clause. Such is the unavoidable consequence today when Negroes claim the full benefits of the Fourteenth (see Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483; 349 U. S. 294), and Fifteenth Amendments. See Alabama v. United States, 304 F. 2d 583, aff’d 371 U. S. 37; United States v. Raines, 362 U. S. 17; United States v. McElveen, 180 F. Supp. 10, aff’d sub nom. United States v. Thomas, 362 U. S. 58. If we are to retain the Pullman doctrine, I think with all deference, we should make it less of a mandatory an…
• South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (U.S. 1966)
  …ited States v. Thomas, 362 U. S. 58. Racial gerrymandering was forbidden by Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U. S. 339. Finally, discriminatory application of voting tests was condemned in Schnell v. Davis, 336 U. S. 933; Alabama [*312] v. United States, 371 U. S. 37; and Louisiana v. United States, 380 U. S. 145. According to the evidence in recent Justice Department voting suits, the latter stratagem is now the principal method used to bar Negroes from the polls. Discriminatory administration of voting qualif…

  ← 1 / 5 →
• Carter v. Jury Comm'n of Greene Cnty., 396 U.S. 320 (U.S. 1970)
  …ve Louisiana Negroes of their right to vote.” 380 U. S., at 151, aff’g 225 F. Supp. 353, 356, 363-381. Cf. South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U. S. 301, 312-313; United States v. Mississippi, 380 U. S. 128, 131-136, 143-144; Alabama v. United States, 371 U. S. 37, per curiam, aff’g 304 F. 2d 583, 584-589, aff’g 192 F. Supp. 677; Schnell v. Davis, 336 U. S. 933, per curiam, aff’g 81 F. Supp. 872, 876, 878-880. In Louisiana v. United States, supra, the District Court held the challenged constitutional provisi…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58 (U.S. 1960)