NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n, Inc. v. United States, 372 U.S. 246 (U.S. 1963)
  …Per Curiam. The petition for rehearing is denied. However, we think we should make clear the basis upon which our per curiam order affirmed the judgment of the District Court. [*247] 371 U. S. 223. The District Court dismissed appellants’ action to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission on two grounds: (1) that the appellants lacked standing to challenge the Commission’s order in the District Court; (2) that the appellants’…
• Koniag, Inc. v. Andrus, 580 F.2d 601 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  …U.S.App.D.C. 83, 88, 489 F. 2d 1207, 1212 n.12 (1973); United States v. Board of Sch. Com’rs. of Indianapolis, Ind., 466 F. 2d 573, 577 (7th Cir. 1972); National Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n v. United States, 205 F.Supp. 529, 593-94 (D.D.C.), aff'd, 371 U.S. 223, 83 S.Ct. 311, 9 L.Ed.2d 273 (1962), reh. denied and opinion clarified, 372 U.S. 246, 83 S.Ct. 688, 9 L.Ed.2d 709 (1963). Commentators have generally recognized that there are practical and theoretical differences between administrative and judicial…
• The Nat'l Welf. Rights Org. v. The Honorable Robert Finch, 429 F.2d 725 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
  …tion in an administrative proceeding,” and that “access to administrative agency proceedings rests on a different basis from standing to sue in this Court.” National Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n v. United States, 205 F. Supp. 592 (D. D.C.), affirmed, 371 U.S. 223, 83 S.Ct. 311, 9 L.Ed.2d 273 (1962), rehearing denied and opinion clarified, 372 U.S. 246, 83 S.Ct. 688, 9 L.Ed.2d 709 (1963) (disagreement with lower court that appellants lacked standing to challenge the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission…