SHENANDOAH VALLEY BROADCASTING, INC., ET AL.

v.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS & PUBLISHERS

Citator

Cited By

• Shenandoah Valley Broad., Inc. v. Am. Soc'y of Composers, 375 U.S. 39 (U.S. 1963)
  …the application. 208 F. Supp. 896. The petitioners took an appeal to the Court of Appeals and also perfected a direct one to this Court under § 2 of the Expediting Act. 15 U. S. C. § 29. We dismissed the appeal filed here for want of jurisdiction, 371 U. S. 540 (1963). Thereafter, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal perfected there, 317 F. 2d 90, on the ground that all appeals are “routed” to this Court by the Expediting Act and this petition brings that question here once again. The dismissal that…
• Weiser v. Honorable Mark White, Jr., 505 F.2d 912 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …assumed that, had the Supreme Court dismissed the case “for want of jurisdiction,” it would have said so. The dismissal was not “for want of jurisdiction,” but “for want of an appealable order.” Compare Shenandoah Valley Broadcasting, Inc. v. ASCAP, 371 U.S. 540, 83 S.Ct. 519, 9 L.Ed.2d 508 (1963) with Washington v. White, 416 U.S. 964, 94 S.Ct. 1985, 40 L.Ed.2d 554 (1974). Furthermore, the Supreme Court did not rule on the intervenors’ alternative request to treat the appeal as a petition for writ of cert…
• United States v. Am. Soc'y OF Composers, 331 F.2d 117 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …District Court dismissing appellants’ application seemed indeed to be “final” so far as this action was concerned, the Supreme Court, without explanation and over Mr. Justice Black’s dissent, had dismissed the appeal that appellants had taken to it, 371 U.S. 540, 83 S.Ct. 519, 9 L.Ed.2d 508 (1963). We thought this-, might have been founded on special principles relating to applications by persons not parties to the action, dismissal of whose claims for relief therein would' leave them free to pursue other r…