BARDY
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
BARDY
UNITED STATES ET AL.
371 U.S. 576
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. EL Paso Natural GAS Co., 386 U.S. 129 (U.S. 1967)…S. 804; Wometco Television & Theatre Co. v. United States, 355 U. S. 40; Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 364 U. S. 518, dismissing appeal from 186 F. Supp. 776; Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. United States, supra; Bardy v. United States, 371 U. S. 576.17 And we have upheld [*152] denial of intervention to a private party who claimed that a decree negotiated between the Government and an antitrust defendant failed to carry out the mandate of this Court. Ball v. United States, 338 U. S. 802. The r…
-
The Idaho Ass'n OF Naturopathic Physicians, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug Admin., 582 F.2d 849 (4th Cir. 1978)…d exclusive jurisdiction over naturopaths on their medical competitors. He also argued that the first amendment right of patients to select a mode of treatment was abridged by the statute. In Stuart v. Wilson, 211 F.Supp. 700 (N.D.Tex.1962), aff’d, 371 U.S. 576, 83 S.Ct. 547, 9 L.Ed.2d 537 (1963), a three-judge district court held that the Texas Medical Practice Act’s licensing requirements were directly and reasonably related to the practice of medicine in general and to naturopathy in particular. The cou…