WADE ET AL.

v.

UNION CARBIDE & CARBON CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Edward C. REA & 22 Ford Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 497 F.2d 577 (3d Cir. 1974)
  …F. 2d 149, 160 (7th Cir. 1972); Duff v. Kansas City Star Co., 299 F. 2d 320, 322 (8th Cir. 1962); Flintkote Co. v. Lysfjord, 246 F. 2d 368, 392 (9th Cir. 1957); Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F. 2d 561, 579 (10th Cir.), cert. dismissed 371 U.S. 801, 83 S.Ct. 13, 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962). . Indeed, the evidence indicated that Triangle charged an average of $50. more per car than did 22 Ford. . The evidence demonstrated that 22 Ford’s percentage of sales in Pittsburgh’s East Liberty area did not in…
• Clair Olsen & Guitar City Studios, Inc. v. Progressive Music Supply, Inc., 703 F.2d 432 (10th Cir. 1983)
  …stimony was improperly received into evidence. The trial court’s rulings on these matters did not prejudicially affect the outcome of the litigation. See Union Carbide and Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F. 2d 561, 586 (10th Cir.1961), appeal dismissed, 371 U.S. 801, 83 S.Ct. 13, 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962); Fed.R.Civ.P. 61. In light of what appears above, it is the conclusion of this court that the judgment of the trial court should be and it is hereby affirmed. APPENDIX [*443] Line . Coleman Motor Co. v. Chrysler…
• LEH v. Gen. Petroleum Corp., 330 F.2d 288 (9th Cir. 1964)
  …t proceedings, not just the conspiracy behind the overt acts. Cf.: 57 Northwestern University L.Rev. . Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 10 Cir. 1961, 300 F. 2d 561, 570, cert. dism. under Rule 60 sub nom. Wade v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 371 U.S. 801, 83 S.Ct. 13, 9 L.Ed.2d 46. Cf.: New Jersey Wood Finishing Co. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., D.C.N.J. 1963, 216 F.Supp. 507.…