WEINFURTNER
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.; KELLEY V. ROYSTER, STATE FARM SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.; DONALDSON V. FLORIDA ET AL.; SCHNEIDER-JIMENEZ V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; TOMKALSKI V. MAXWELL, WARDEN, ET AL.; EX PARTE SCHLETTE; MELENDEZ V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; BROWNING V. KANSAS ET AL.; CASTRO V. KLINGER, PRISON SUPERINTENDENT; ORTIZ V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; WHITE V. CONBOY, WARDEN, ET AL.; REYES V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; SCARANO V. REINCKE, WARDEN; MCCALL V. MCDONALD, SHERIFF; CREAGH V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ET AL.; BRAY V. UNITED STATES; STILTNER V. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.; AND MUZA V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.

U.S. | 1962-10-08
Nos. 172, Misc.; No. 175, Misc.; No. 212, Misc.; No. 234, Misc.; No. 246, Misc.; No. 256, Misc.; No. 262, Misc.; No. 287, Misc.; No. 332, Misc.; No. 347, Misc.; No. 355, Misc.; No. 373, Misc.; No. 391, Misc.; No. 396, Misc.; No. 397, Misc.; No. 422, Misc.; No. 427, Misc.; No. 450, Misc.
371 U.S. 806 Supreme Court of the United States (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1963)
  • Arley C. Browning v. Crouse, 327 F.2d 529 (10th Cir. 1964)
    …Browning v. Hand, 10 Cir., 284 F. 2d 346, cer-tiorari denied 369 U.S. 821, 82 S.Ct. 833, 7 L.Ed.2d 786; Browning v. Hand, No. 3226 H.C., United States District Court for the District of Kansas (not reported, no appeal perfected); Browning v. Kansas, 371 U.S. 806, 83 S.Ct. 87, 9 L.Ed.2d 89; Browning v. Crouse, 190 Kan. 632, 377 P. 2d 179; and Browning v. Crouse, No. 1505 H.C., District Court of Leavenworth County, Kansas (not reported). On the habeas corpus which is the subject of this appeal, the trial cou…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw