WEINFURTNER
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.; KELLEY V. ROYSTER, STATE FARM SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.; DONALDSON V. FLORIDA ET AL.; SCHNEIDER-JIMENEZ V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; TOMKALSKI V. MAXWELL, WARDEN, ET AL.; EX PARTE SCHLETTE; MELENDEZ V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; BROWNING V. KANSAS ET AL.; CASTRO V. KLINGER, PRISON SUPERINTENDENT; ORTIZ V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; WHITE V. CONBOY, WARDEN, ET AL.; REYES V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; SCARANO V. REINCKE, WARDEN; MCCALL V. MCDONALD, SHERIFF; CREAGH V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ET AL.; BRAY V. UNITED STATES; STILTNER V. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.; AND MUZA V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.
WEINFURTNER
CALIFORNIA ET AL.; KELLEY V. ROYSTER, STATE FARM SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.; DONALDSON V. FLORIDA ET AL.; SCHNEIDER-JIMENEZ V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; TOMKALSKI V. MAXWELL, WARDEN, ET AL.; EX PARTE SCHLETTE; MELENDEZ V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; BROWNING V. KANSAS ET AL.; CASTRO V. KLINGER, PRISON SUPERINTENDENT; ORTIZ V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; WHITE V. CONBOY, WARDEN, ET AL.; REYES V. HERITAGE, WARDEN; SCARANO V. REINCKE, WARDEN; MCCALL V. MCDONALD, SHERIFF; CREAGH V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ET AL.; BRAY V. UNITED STATES; STILTNER V. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.; AND MUZA V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.
371 U.S. 806
Supreme Court of the United States (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1963)
-
Arley C. Browning v. Crouse, 327 F.2d 529 (10th Cir. 1964)…Browning v. Hand, 10 Cir., 284 F. 2d 346, cer-tiorari denied 369 U.S. 821, 82 S.Ct. 833, 7 L.Ed.2d 786; Browning v. Hand, No. 3226 H.C., United States District Court for the District of Kansas (not reported, no appeal perfected); Browning v. Kansas, 371 U.S. 806, 83 S.Ct. 87, 9 L.Ed.2d 89; Browning v. Crouse, 190 Kan. 632, 377 P. 2d 179; and Browning v. Crouse, No. 1505 H.C., District Court of Leavenworth County, Kansas (not reported). On the habeas corpus which is the subject of this appeal, the trial cou…