WHEELDIN ET AL.

v.

WHEELER

Citator

Cited By

• Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (U.S. 1963)
  …s held that suppression of the evidence by the prosecution denied petitioner due process of law and remanded the case for a retrial of the question of punishment, not the question of guilt. 226 Md. 422, 174 A. 2d 167. The case is here on certiorari, 371 U. S. 812.1 The crime in question was murder committed in the perpetration of a robbery. Punishment for that crime in Maryland is life imprisonment or death, the jury being empowered to restrict the punishment to life by addition of the words “without capita…
• Gutierrez v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 373 U.S. 206 (U.S. 1963)
  …, 167-168; Ford Motor Co. v. Treasury Dept., 323 U. S. 459, 467 ; Matson Nav. Co. v. United States, 284 U. S. 352, 359 (admiralty case); Grace v. American Ins. Co., 109 U. S. 278, 283; Hope Ins. Co. v. Boardman, 5 Cranch 57; see Wheeldin v. Wheeler, 371 U. S. 812; Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U. S. 294, 305-306. Respondent contends that it is not liable, at least in admiralty, because the impact of its alleged lack of care or unseaworthiness was felt on the pier rather than aboard ship. Whatever val…
• Wheeldin v. Wheeler, 373 U.S. 647 (U.S. 1963)
  …for money damages,” and to that extent reversed. 280 F. 2d 293. On remand the District Court dismissed the action without opinion. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 302 F. 2d 36. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted. 371 U. S. 812. The basic question presented is whether a federal claim for damages is stated. We agree with the Court of Appeals in its first opinion (280 F. 2d 293) that on the face of the complaint the federal court had jurisdiction. As we stated in Bell v. Ho…