ROBERT E. LEE & CO., INC., ET AL.

v.

VEATCH ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS BLACK & VEATCH

Citator

Cited By

• Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n & Michael Pertschuk, 580 F.2d 264 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …1974); Manchester Modes, Inc. v. Schuman, 426 F. 2d 629, 630 (2d Cir. 1970); Carter-Beveridge Drilling Co., Inc. v. Hughes, 323 F. 2d 417 (5th Cir. 1963) (per curiam); Robert E. Lee & Co. v. Veatch, 301 F. 2d 434, 438 (4th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 813, 83 S.Ct. 23, 9 L.Ed.2d 55 (1962). See also D. C. Electronics, Inc. v. Schlesinger, 368 F.Supp. 1029, 1032 (N.D.Ill.1974). . In 1966, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) was amended to include venue in the district in which the claim arose. Act of Nov. 2, 1966, Pu…
• Manchester Modes, Inc. v. Adolph P. Schuman, 426 F.2d 629 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …h we are in agreement with Judge Sobeloff’s view that, despite its seeming generality, the second clause was no more intended to apply to a corporate plaintiff than the first, Robert E. Lee & Co. v. Veatch, 301 F. 2d 434 (4 Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 813, 83 S.Ct. 23, 9 L.Ed.2d 55 (1962),1 the considerable amount of water that has run under the bridge in the last decade and the continued division of opinion of district courts and commentators lead us to state the reasons for our conclusion. The par…
• Carter-Beveridge Drilling Co., Inc. v. Hughes, 323 F.2d 417 (5th Cir. 1963)
  …licensed to do business or is doing business, and such defendant corporation is considered a resident of the judicial district for venue purposes. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(c); Robert E. Lee & Co., Inc. v. Veatch, 301 F. 2d 434 (C.A. 4, 1961), cert. denied 371 U.S. 813, 83 5. Ct. 23, 9 L.Ed.2d 55 (1962). Affirmed.…