ROBINSON
v.
MINNESOTA
ROBINSON
MINNESOTA
371 U.S. 815
Supreme Court of the United States (1962)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Meehan v. Macy, 392 F.2d 822 (D.C. Cir. 1968)…F.Supp. 893 (D.Colo.1967); Krennrich v. United States, 340 F. 2d 653, 169 Ct.Cl. 6 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 870, 86 S.Ct 147, 15 L.Ed.2d 109 (1965); Houston v. United States, 297 F. 2d 838, 156 Ct.Cl. 38 (Ct.Cl.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 815, 83 S.Ct. 27, 9 L.Ed.2d 56 (1962); Dulcy v. United States, 284 F. 2d 687 (Ct.Cl.1960). In addition, see Bagley, Watts, and Pickering, note 24 supra. . Compare NLRB v. Washington Aluminum Co., 370 U.S. 9, 17, 82 S.Ct. 1099, 8 L.Ed.2d 298 (1962); NLR…
-
Swaaley v. The United States, 376 F.2d 857 (Ct. Cl. 1967)…ight. Cf. Garrity v. State of New Jersey, supra. In our view, plaintiff herein did not by writing the Secretary breach his duty of loyalty as we saw Harrington as having done. In Houston v. United States, 156 Ct. Cl. 38, 297 F. 2d 838, cert. denied 371 U.S. 815, 83 S.Ct. 27, 9 L.Ed.2d 56 (1962), plaintiff made his defamatory statements to an investigator sent to take them, so there was no going outside channels, but no “petition” either. He charged two of his superiors in a field office with dishonesty, in…
-
Amphenol Corp. v. Gen. Time Corp., 397 F.2d 431 (7th Cir. 1968)…patent unless — * * * (b) the invention was * * * on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States, * * *. . L. S. Donaldson Co. v. LaMaur, 8 Cir., 1962, 299 F. 2d 412, 420, cert. den. 371 U.S. 815, 83 S.Ct. 27, 9 L.Ed.2d 57; American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc., 8 Cir., 1966, 360 F. 2d 977, 989, cert. den. 385 U.S. 920, 87 S.Ct. 233, 17 L.Ed.2d 144.…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence