OZARK DAIRY CO. ET AL.

v.

ADAMS DAIRY CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• IVY Broad. Co., Inc. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. & N.Y. Tel. Co., 391 F.2d 486 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …nd those subscribing to its network broadcast in interstate commerce; if so, telephone transmission of the broadcasts originating in New York is subject to the Communications Act. Ward v. Northern Ohio Tel. Co., 300 F. 2d 816 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 820, 83 S.Ct. 37, 9 L.Ed. 2d 61 (1962); cf., e.g., Hamilton County Tel. Co. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., 180 Neb. 1, 140 N.W. 2d 834 (1960); Pacific Telatronics, Inc., 37 F.C.C. 1163 (1964). . After hearing oral argument on the appeal, we requested a…
• Gen. Tel. Co. OF Cal. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 413 F.2d 390 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
  …ocated within Idaho, it performs an interstate communication service when it takes part in the transmission of signals from Utah to Idaho. Id. at 256, 352 F. 2d at 732, citing, Ward v. Northern Ohio Tel. Co., 300 F. 2d 816 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 820, 83 S.Ct. 37, 9 L.Ed.2d 61 (1962); see Pacific Teletronics, Inc., 37 F.C.C. 1163 (1964). Similarly in California Interstate Tel. Co. v. FCC, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 255, 328 F. 2d 556 (1964), we found no difficulty in affirming a Commission determination…
• Puerto RICO Tel. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 553 F.2d 694 (1st Cir. 1977)
  …Services Corp. v. FCC, 474 F. 2d 724, 736 (2d Cir. 1973) (connecting carrier bound by FCC rules governing relationship between data processing and communications services); Ward v. Northern Ohio Telephone Co., 300 F. 2d 816 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 820, 83 S.Ct. 37, 9 L.Ed.2d 61 (1962) (connecting carrier required to furnish intrastate telephone lines to radio stations broadcasting interstate). Thus, we agree with the majority in North Carolina Utilities Comm’n, supra, 537 F. 2d at 793, that, whi…