HARRIS

v.

MCGARRAGHY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 (6th Cir. 1965)
  …ons had not been timely filed and that no showing was made which entitled Appellants to a hearing. Rule 12(b) (2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure required motions of this type to be filed before trial. Shotwell Mfg. Co. v. United States, 371 U.S. 841, 83 S.Ct. 448, 9 L.Ed.2d 357 (1963); Frazier v. United States, 335 U.S. 497, 69 S.Ct. 201, 93 L.Ed. 187 (1948). The purpose of the rule undoubtedly was to prevent the diversion of a trial by protracted excursions into. preliminary matters at a time…
• Compton v. Alton S.S. Co., Inc., 608 F.2d 96 (4th Cir. 1979)
  …ermann v. United States (1950), 340 U.S. 193, 202, 71 S.Ct. 209, 95 L.Ed.2d 207; Martinez-McBean v. Government of Virgin Islands (3d Cir. 1977), 562 F. 2d 908, 911; Flett v. W. A. Alexander & Company (7th Cir. 1962) 302 F. 2d 321, 324, cert. denied 371 U.S. 841, 83 S.Ct. 71, 9 L.Ed.2d 77; Silvers v. TTC Industries, Inc. (E.D.Tenn.1974), 395 F.Supp. 1318, 1321, aff’d, 6th Cir., 513 F. 2d 632; Hughes v. Sanders (E.D.Okl.1968) 287 F.Supp. 332, 334. In determining whether to exercise the power to relieve again…
• de Filippis v. United States, 567 F.2d 341 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …lysis by recognizing that a Rule 60(b) motion to vacate is not a substitute for an appeal. Ackermann v. United States, 340 U.S. 193, 198, 71 S.Ct. 209, 95 L.Ed. 207 (1950); Flett v. W. A. Alexander & Co., 302 F. 2d 321, 324 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 371 U.S. 841, 83 S.Ct. 71, 9 L.Ed.2d 77 (1962). Rule 60(b) provides for extraordinary relief. Because of the interest in finality of judgments, Rule 60(b) requires a showing of exceptional circumstances or a grievous wrong evoked by new and unforeseen conditions…