STATE, EX REL. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DUVAL COUNTY,
v.
PERCY L. THOMAS, AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DUVAL COUNTY

Fla. | 1936-09-14
Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur., Brown, J., concurs specially.
125 Fla. 274 Florida Supreme Court (1936) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 169 So. 684
Cited by 8 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court granted a writ of mandamus compelling the Chairman of the Board of Public Instruction of Duval County to sign $80,000 in school district bonds that had been validated in bond validation proceedings. The court held that once a validation decree is entered without appeal, the validity of bonds cannot be questioned and defects in publication or election procedures are foreclosed.


Holding

The court held that a peremptory writ of mandamus should be granted requiring the Chairman to sign the bonds. Once a validation decree is properly entered and not appealed, the validity of the bonds can never be questioned in any Florida court on account of defects in publication or election procedures, and the objections raised by the respondent constitute no sufficient ground for refusing to sign.


Key Quotes

“Defects, if any, concerning the manner of publication of the resolution and notice required by Sections' 722 and 723 C. G. L., 581 and 582 R. G. S. regarding the call and holding of the bond election at which the bonds were duly voted and authorized, as appears of record, have therefore been forever foreclosed by the validating decree and Section 5109 C. G. L., 3299 R. G. S., because the validity of said bonds can never be called in question in any of the courts of this State on account thereof, now that said validation decree has been entered pursuant to.law and has not been attacked by appeal.”

Establishes that a validation decree, once entered without appeal, forecloses all defects in publication and election procedures and prevents any future challenge to bond validity.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Special Tax School District Number 5 of Duval County issued $80,000 in bonds dated January 1, 1936, with interest at four percent payable semi-annuall…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Davis, J.

Davis, J.

— The bonds herein involved are certain bonds of Special Tax School District Number 5, of Duval County, Florida, in the principal amount of $80,000.00, to bear interest at the rate of four per cent, per annum payable semi-annually, dated January 1, 1936, to become due and payable in the amount of $2,500.00 payable on January 1, 1938 to 1952, both inclusive, $3,000.00 on January 1, 1953 to 1965, both inclusive, and $3,500.00 on January 1, 1966.

It appears from the allegations of the alternative writ of mandamus herein, to which has been attached and made a part of the writ, a certified copy of the record of the bond validation proceedings had in the Circuit Court of Duval County that resulted in a final decree approving, ratifying and validating the issuance of said bonds as being in all respects in conformity to the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, which final decree was duly entered and enrolled March 12, 1936, that under and by virtue of Sections 720-729, Inch C. G. L. 579-588 R. G. S. appropriate proceedings have been duly had and taken for the issuance of said bonds and that all things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, including the affirmative approving vote of the freeholder electors of the issuing district, to render said bonds valid obligations of the obligor special tax school district, have been done in compliance with the requirements of law pertaining thereto. All of said con*276ditions precedent are furthermore shown to have been duly put in issue in the bond validation proceeding had in the Circuit Court to which reference had been heretofore made, ánd thereupon to have been judicially investigated and finally adjudicated in favor of the validity of said bonds in the final decree rendered by the Circuit Court in said proceeding, of which it appears that the- Circuit Court had duly acquired jurisdiction by appropriate proceedings had and taken to that end.

The petition for validation was duly filed, no interested persons intervened to contest the validity of the projected issue and the validation decree was duly signed and made of record. Defects, if any, concerning the manner of publication of the resolution and notice required by Sections' 722 and 723 C. G. L., 581 and 582 R. G. S. regarding the call and holding of the bond election at which the bonds were duly voted and authorized, as appears of record, have therefore been forever foreclosed by the validating decree and Section 5109 C. G. L., 3299 R. G. S., because the validity of said bonds can never be called in question in any of the courts of this State on account thereof, now that said validation decree has been entered pursuant to.law and has not been attacked by appeal. Weinberger v. Board of Public instruction, 93 Fla. 470, 112 Sou. Rep. 253; Rountree v. Georgia Bond & Mortgage Co., 102 Fla. 259, 135. Sou. Rep. 894.

Peremptory writ of mandamus granted to require respondent to sign each and all of the bonds hereinbefore described, in his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Public Instruction of Duval County, it appearing that the objections raised by said respondent as grounds for his refusal to do so constitute no sufficient ground for such refusal.

Judgment for relator entered. •

*277Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., concurs specially.

Brown, J.

(concurring). — It does not appear that there were any defects in the manner of the publication of the resolution and notice of election. There may have been some slight irregularity in procedure, any question as' to which was completely set at rest by the decree of validation.

Concurrence
Brown, J.

Brown, J.

(concurring). — It does not appear that there were any defects in the manner of the publication of the resolution and notice of election. There may have been some slight irregularity in procedure, any question as' to which was completely set at rest by the decree of validation.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. City of Pompano, 136 Fla. 730 (Fla. 1938)
    …rd required by law to be made and kept of the proceedings had in issuing the bonds, that some provision of organic law was violated in issuing the bonds. See State, ex rel. Rodgers, 125 Fla. 423, 170 So. 113; State, ex rel., v. Thomas, 125 Fla. 274, 169 So. 684; A. C. L. Ry. Co. v. City of Lakeland, 130 Fla. 72, 177 So. 206. It is not shown in this case that the validating decree is not conclusive as to the validity of the bonds in controversy here. As to what constitutes res adjudicata see Stoll v. Golli…
  • Wright v. City OF Anna Maria, 160 Fla. 324 (Fla. 1948)
    …illegality of their issue, including questions of both law and fact, so far as those matters or things could be authorized by the Legislature to be put in repose by a judicial proceeding. In State ex rel. Duval County [*329] v. Thomas, 125 Fla. 274, 169 So. 684, we held that after a validation decree was entered the validity of bonds could never be questions in any of the courts of Florida on account of the validity or irregularity thereof when said validating decree had been entered pursuant to law and ha…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw