LINK

v.

WABASH RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Texas v. NEW Jersey, 379 U.S. 674 (U.S. 1965)
  …v. Pennsylvania, 368 U. S. 71, that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , prevents more than one State from escheat-ing a given item of property, we granted Texas leave to file this complaint against New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Sun, 371 U. S. 873, and referred the case to the Honorable Walter A. Huxman to sit as Special Master to take evidence [*677] and make appropriate reports, 372 U. S. 926.5 Florida was permitted to intervene since it claimed, the right to escheat the portion of Sun’s es…
• Meeker v. Rizley, 324 F.2d 269 (10th Cir. 1963)
  …t power to dismiss a plaintiff’s action for failure to prosecute or to comply with the rules of federal procedure or any order of the court.1 Rule 41(b) Fed.R.Civ.Proc.; Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626,2 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734, reh. denied 371 U.S. 873, 83 S.Ct. 115, 9 L.Ed.2d 112. The exercise of this power is discretionary, and such discretion will be sustained in the absence of abuse. Sweeney v. Anderson, 10 Cir., 129 F. 2d 756; Shotkin v. Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co., 10 Cir., 169 F. 2d 825.…
• Davis v. Operation Amigo, Inc., 378 F.2d 101 (10th Cir. 1967)
  …ppealed from dismissing appellants’ case and granting appellees judgment on their counterclaims is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings. . Link v. Wabash R. R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734, rehearing denied, 371 U.S. 873, 83 S.Ct. 115, 9 L.Ed.2d 112; Shotkin v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. et al., 10 Cir., 109 F. 2d 825; Fitzsimmons v. Gilpin, 9 Cir., 368 F. 2d 561; West v. Gilbert, 2 Cir., 361 F. 2d 314, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 919, 87 S.Ct. 229, 17 L.Ed.2d 143.…