SURRATT
v.
UNITED STATES
SURRATT
UNITED STATES
371 U.S. 880
Supreme Court of the United States (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shorter v. United States, 412 F.2d 428 (9th Cir. 1969)…508, 511 (conviction in 1958); Bates v. Nelson (1968), 393 U.S. 16, 89 S.Ct. 50, 21 L.Ed.2d 21 (conviction in 1956). . The prior histories of the Bates and Chavea cases are summarized in Chavez v. Dickson (9 Cir. 1962), 300 F. 2d 683, cert. denied 371 U.S. 880, 83 S.Ct. 151, 9 L.Ed.2d 116, rehearing denied 371 U.S. 931, 83 S.Ct. 295, 9 L.Ed.2d 239; see People v. Chavez, 50 Cal.2d 778, 329 P. 2d 907, cert. den. 358 U.S. 946, 79 S.Ct. 356, 3 L.Ed.2d 353; see also Chavez v. Dickson (9 Cir. 1960), 280 F. 2d 7…
-
United States v. Easterly, 444 F.2d 1236 (5th Cir. 1971)…and believe from all the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant is guilty.” . Holmgren v. United States, 1910, 217 U.S. 509, 30 S.Ct. 588, 54 L.Ed. 861; Surratt v. United States, 1959, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 49, 269 F. 2d 240, cert. denied 371 U.S. 880, 83 S.Ct. 152, 9 L.Ed.2d 116; Pool v. United States, 9th Cir. 1958, 260 F. 2d 57; United States v. Noble, 3rd Cir. 1946, 155 F. 2d 315; Blanton v. United States, 8th Cir. 1914, 213 F. 320.…
-
United States v. Bernett, 495 F.2d 943 (D.C. Cir. 1974)…Singer v. United States, 380 U.S. 24, 38, 85 S.Ct. 783, 13 L.Ed.2d 630 (1965); Howard v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 336, 339, 389 F. 2d 287, 290 (1967); Surratt v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 49, 50, 269 F. 2d 240, 241 (1959), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 880, 83 S.Ct. 152, 9 L.Ed.2d 116 (1962); Tatum v. United States, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 386, 388-389, 190 F. 2d 612, 614-615 (1951); Felton v. United States, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 277, 278, 170 F. 2d 153, 154, cert. denied, 335 U.S. 831, 69 S.Ct. 18, 93 L.Ed. 385 (1…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence