ANDERSON

v.

KENTUCKY

Citator

Cited By

• Boesche v. Udall, 373 U.S. 472 (U.S. 1963)
  …, and that of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Pierson, 284 F. 2d 649, and also because of the importance of the question to the proper administration of the Mineral Leasing Act, we brought the case here. 371 U. S. 886. For reasons stated hereafter we affirm the judgment below. Section 17 of the Mineral Leasing Act, 30 U. S. C. § 226, authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to grant to the first qualified applicant, without competitive bidding, oil and gas lease…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• DOE v. Casey, 796 F.2d 1508 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
  …s] necessary or advisable in the interests of the United States.” This is precisely the role to which this court limited itself in finding that the Director had acted within his authority in Torpats v. McCone, 300 F. 2d 914 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 886, 83 S.Ct. 182, 9 L.Ed.2d 121 (1962). See also Service v. Dulles, 235 F. 2d 215 (D.C.Cir.1956). In the instant case, as in Torpats, the record contains the Director’s sworn statement that “[ajfter careful consideration of [*1534] the matter, [the Di…

  ← 1 / 3 →