HEAD ET AL.

v.

MISSISSIPPI

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Humble OIL & Ref. Co. v. Am. OIL Co., 405 F.2d 803 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …lic normally assumes that articles bearing the same mark are from the same source.” 3 Callmann, Unfair Competition and Trade-Marks, § 84.1, at 1628 (2 ed. 1950). Feathercombs, Inc. v. Solo Prods. Corp., 306 F. 2d 251, 255 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 910, 83 S.Ct. 253, 9 L.Ed.2d 170. Thus Indiana’s use of the name in the 15-state area identifies a certain chain of stations and certain products as coming from a particular source. The fact that it does not precisely identify Indiana as that source ma…
• Perfect FIT Indus., Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc., 618 F.2d 950 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …self principally with whether or not the public is likely to be confused, rather than with whether the first comer’s trade dress has acquired secondary meaning. See Feathercombs, Inc. v. Solo Prods. Corp., 306 F. 2d 251, 258 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 910, 83 S.Ct. 253, 9 L.Ed.2d 170 (1962); Avon Periodicals Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co., 282 App.Div. 200, 122 N.Y.S.2d 92 (1953), aff’g 27 Misc.2d 160, 113 N.Y.S.2d 737 (Sup.Ct.1952); see also Noma Lites, Inc. v. Lawn Spray, Inc., 222 F. 2d 716 (2d…
• Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc., 560 F.2d 1325 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …o become generic the principal significance of the word must be its indication of the nature or class of an article, rather than an indication of its origin.” Feathercombs, Inc. v. Solo Products Corp., 306 F. 2d 251, 256 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 910, 83 S.Ct. 253, 9 L.Ed.2d 170 (1962); accord, Gilson, Trademark Protection and Practice, § 2.02[1] at 2-11 to 2-14 (1976). The record does not reveal that the trademark Arm & Hammer has become the generic name for baking soda, but merely shows that t…