ABERNATHY ET AL.

v.

SULLIVAN

Citator

Cited By

• N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (U.S. 1964)
  …directed against State action and not private action.” Id., at 676, 144 So. 2d, at 40. Because of the importance of the constitutional issues involved, we granted the separate petitions for certiorari of the individual petitioners and of the Times. 371 U. S. 946. We reverse the judgment. We hold that the rule of law applied by the Alabama courts is constitutionally deficient for failure to provide the safeguards for freedom of speech and of the press that are required by the First and Fourteenth Amendments…
• Curtis Publ'g Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1967)
  …ly as a cloak for venting private malice, and not bona fide in promotion of the object for which the privilege is granted, the party defamed shall have a right of action.” Certiorari was granted in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan on January 7, 1963. 371 U. S. 946. The complaint in this case was filed approximately months later, on March 25, 1963. Counsel here could not have anticipated the precise standard we announced in New York Times. In the Bryant lawsuit and, of course, in the New York Times case itself…
• Durfee et ux. v. Duke, 375 U.S. 106 (U.S. 1963)
  …a court in Missouri was therefore free to retry the question of the Nebraska court’s jurisdiction over the subject matter. 308 F. 2d 209. We granted certiorari to consider a question important to the administration of justice in our federal system. 371 U. S. 946. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment before us. The constitutional command of full faith and credit, as implemented by Congress, requires that “judicial proceedings . . . shall have the same full faith and credit in every court wit…