TRI-PHARMACY, INC., ET AL.
v.
VIRGINIA
TRI-PHARMACY, INC., ET AL.
VIRGINIA
371 U.S. 962
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (U.S. 1971)
-
United States v. Steele, 461 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir. 1972)…fusal to cooperate should be read to include refusal to provide no more than head count information. . Steel’s Fourth Amendment challenge to the census is without merit. See United States v. Rickenbacker, 309 F. 2d 462 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 962, 83 S.Ct. 542, 9 L.Ed.2d 509. (1963). . “Though the law itself be fair on its face and impartial in appearance, yet, if it is applied and administered by public authority with an evil eye and an unequal hand, so as practically to make unjust and il…
-
Riggan v. Virginia, 384 U.S. 152 (U.S. 1966)…an affidavit with allegations identical to those now in question was approved by the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in Tri-Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States, 203 Va. 723, 127 S. E. 2d 89 (1962). We denied certiorari in Tri-Pharmacy in January 1963, 371 U. S. 962, before Aguilar but a month after the argument in Ker v. California, 374 U. S. 23 (1963), and during the same Term that the opinion in Ker was announced. In view of the fact that Ker is the first and leading case on the implementation of Mapp v. Ohi…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence