RUDNICKI

v.

COX ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …F.Supp. 1075 (W.D.Mo.1983); Richcreek v. Grecu, 612 F.Supp. 111 (S.D.Ind. 1985); Hanson v. Goodwin, 432 F.Supp. 853 (W.D.Wash.), appeal dismissed, 566 F. 2d 1181 (9th Cir.1977); Rudnicki v. McCormack, 210 F.Supp. 905 (D.R.I.1962), appeal dismissed, 372 U.S. 226, 83 S.Ct. 679, 9 L.Ed.2d 714 (1963). A number of other courts, while not imposing injunctions in the particular case, have recognized the courts’ power to enter this sort of injunction. Sires v. Gabriel, 748 F. 2d 49 (1st Cir.1984); Carter v. Unite…
• In re Reverend Clovis Carl Green, Jr., 669 F.2d 779 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …plaint herein”); Rud-nicki v. McCormack, 210 F.Supp. 905 (D.R.I.) (order enjoining plaintiff from prosecuting any action, without leave of court, against certain government officials for actions taken within their official duties), appeal dismissed, 372 U.S. 226, 83 S.Ct. 679, 9 L.Ed.2d 714 (1963); Bo-ruski v. Stewart, 381 F.Supp. 529 (S.D.N.Y. 1974) (injunction against instituting any further actions based on any matters set forth in the complaint); Ruderer v. United States, 462 F. 2d 897 (8th Cir.), cert.…
• Chandler v. O'Bryan, 445 F.2d 1045 (10th Cir. 1971)
  …John Deere Plow Co., 261 F. 2d 121 (8th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 909, 79 S.Ct. 586, 3 L.Ed.2d 574 (1959); 600 California Corp. v. Harjean, 284 F.Supp. 843 (N.D.Tex.1968); Rudnicki v. McCormack, 210 F.Supp. 905 (D.R.I.1962), app. dismissed, 372 U.S. 226, 83 S.Ct. 679, 9 L.Ed.2d 714 (1963). But these circumstances ordinarily arise only when the parties are otherwise properly before the court on an underlying cause of action within the court’s jurisdiction, and that cause of action has been determine…